Direct shipment in trade agreements: SUNAT’s current position and reflections on its proper enforcement
Currently, Superintendencia Nacional de Administración Tributaria (SUNAT) continues to focus on maintaining a rigid performance of its control function. Despite having the tools and means to exchange information with customs authorities around the world, it makes languid efforts to...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28386 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/28386 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | SUNAT MINCETUR Direct shipment Trade agreements Burden of proof Legal certainty Expedición directa Acuerdos comerciales Carga de prueba Seguridad jurídica |
| Sumario: | Currently, Superintendencia Nacional de Administración Tributaria (SUNAT) continues to focus on maintaining a rigid performance of its control function. Despite having the tools and means to exchange information with customs authorities around the world, it makes languid efforts to facilitate the accreditation of direct shipment and the access to tariff benefits.In this article, the author analyzes that the position adopted by SUNAT hinders the transportation of goods in import activities. He also reflects on the uncertainty that exists in the delimitation of competence between SUNAT and MINCETUR to issue technical opinions. |
|---|