Afectividad, síntomas somáticos y dolor psicológico como dimensiones del bienestar: un modelo de senderos en estudiantes universitarios chilenos

In order to evaluate the fit of a theoretical model to explain Mental Well-being from Positive and Negative Affect, Somatic Symptoms and Psychological Pain, 260 university students from Chile participated voluntarily, who answered the EBMWE, PANAS, SSS-8 and MBPPAS scales. The multivariate statistic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: González-Arias, Mauricio, Barraza Panta, Javiera, Barrientos Yáñez, Paula, Contreras-Díaz, Hedbenhard, Marín Jara, Eliana, Martínez Reyes, Bárbara
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:Perú
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:PUCP-Institucional
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/194698
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/27071/25353
https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/194698
https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202302.007
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Mental well-being
Psychological pain
Affectivity
Somatic symptoms
Bien-être mental
Douleur psychologique
Affectivité
Symptômes somatiques
Bem-estar mental
Dor psicológica
Afetividade
Sintomas somáticos
Bienestar mental
Dolor psicológico
Afectividad
Síntomas somáticos
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.01.00
Descripción
Sumario:In order to evaluate the fit of a theoretical model to explain Mental Well-being from Positive and Negative Affect, Somatic Symptoms and Psychological Pain, 260 university students from Chile participated voluntarily, who answered the EBMWE, PANAS, SSS-8 and MBPPAS scales. The multivariate statistical technique of Path Analysis was used and the results indicated that Mental Well-Being is explained by direct relationships with Positive Affect, Negative Affect and Psychological Pain. Somatic Symptoms would have an indirect effect through Negative Affect and Psychological Pain. It is concluded that the variables of the model explain 72% of the variance of Mental Well-being.