Evidence ex officio in arbitration
This article seeks to demonstrate the thesis that ex officio evidence in arbitration is unnecessary and should be eliminated from it or its application reduced to the minimum possible. For this, the author provides an approximation of the concept of ex officio proof and describes, through the releva...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20391 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/20391 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Evidence ex officio Arbitration Arbitral Tribunal Source of evidence Means of proof Prueba de oficio Arbitraje Tribunal Arbitral Fuente de prueba Medios de prueba |
| Sumario: | This article seeks to demonstrate the thesis that ex officio evidence in arbitration is unnecessary and should be eliminated from it or its application reduced to the minimum possible. For this, the author provides an approximation of the concept of ex officio proof and describes, through the relevant regulations, its use in arbitration. Finally, it analyzes the admissibility of the same, stating that it must opt for a limited admissibility for certain cases, and that it respects the procedural guarantees of the parties. |
|---|