Judges and argumentation
The construction of legal arguments by a judge requires the correlation of necessary concepts that identify the theory of law, the philosophy of law, the fundamental rights and the proposal of schools of legal argumentation. Our study offers a few initial thoughts on how the judicial work can be str...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2012 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/277 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/277 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Argumentation Context of discovery and justification Internal justification External justification Judges Argumentación Contextos de descubrimiento y justificación Justificación interna Justificación externa Jueces |
| Sumario: | The construction of legal arguments by a judge requires the correlation of necessary concepts that identify the theory of law, the philosophy of law, the fundamental rights and the proposal of schools of legal argumentation. Our study offers a few initial thoughts on how the judicial work can be strengthened by identifying core concepts related to the proposed ideas and by providing arguments to justify them |
|---|