Manslaughter in road traffic: Contradictory case law based on misapplied dogmatics
The deaths that run red the roads with blood are a problem that arose when men began to use motor vehicles as a sign of modernity. The legal implications derived from the reckless behavior of road users, such as drivers or pedestrians, have not been treated with the same attention as mens rea cases....
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | Perú |
| Recursos: | Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/738 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/738 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | selfendangerment controlled driving recklessness charges objective accusation source of danger principle of trust traffic regulations permissible risk autopuesta en peligro conducción controlada imprudencia imputación al tipo imputación objetiva fuente de peligro principio de confianza reglas de tránsito riesgo permitido |
| Resumo: | The deaths that run red the roads with blood are a problem that arose when men began to use motor vehicles as a sign of modernity. The legal implications derived from the reckless behavior of road users, such as drivers or pedestrians, have not been treated with the same attention as mens rea cases. In this context, the subject matter of this research is the observance of dogmatic scholar theories that have not been fully and specifically developed to cases of concurrent recklessness, which implies a reinterpretation of foreign scholar doctrine in order to make a de lege ferenda proposal. |
|---|