MOTHERS POSITIVE TO CRYPTOSPORIDIUM PARVUM AS A RISK FACTOR FOR THE PRESENCE OF THE PATHOGEN IN NEWBORN ALPACAS WITH DIARRHEA

The aim of the study was to establish whether the presence of Cryptosporidium parvum in the dam is a risk factor for the presentation of the pathogen in the baby alpaca. The study included 698 alpaca dams and their offspring less than 30 days of age. The sampling took place from January till March 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Aguilar J., R Vladimir, González Z., Armando, López Urbina, Teresa, Perales Camacho, Rosa, González Gustavson, Eloy, Angulo J., Carlos, Gómez P., Luis
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2013
País:Perú
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/2515
Acceso en línea:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/2515
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Alpaca
Cryptosporidium spp
Ziehl-Neelsen modificada
factor de riesgo.
alpaca
modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain
risk factor
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of the study was to establish whether the presence of Cryptosporidium parvum in the dam is a risk factor for the presentation of the pathogen in the baby alpaca. The study included 698 alpaca dams and their offspring less than 30 days of age. The sampling took place from January till March 2007 in the localities of La Raya, Choquecota, Chillihua, Maranganí and Silli in Canchis province, Cusco, Peru. Fecal samples were collected from the rectum, processed using the Modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain and observed by microscopy. Risk analysis was done through logistic regressions. Results showed that a baby alpaca born from a positive dam to C. parvum was 2.1 times more likely to get infected with the parasite as compared with others born from a negative dam (p<0.05). Likewise, sex and presence of diarrhea were not significant, whereas place of breeding showed to be a protection factor for newborns in peasant communities as compared to those born in experimental station farms.