RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF OPINION IN THE INTENTION TO VOTE IN MUNICIPAL AND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS TO STUDENTS OF THE UNMSM

In the present work, we present the results of the opinion poll of voting intentions of the students of San Marcos University in municipal elections of 2010 and presidential elections of 2011. We used stratified random sampling with allocation proportional to size (Scheffer y Mendenhall, 2007) and c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Solano Dávila, Olga, Bartolo Gotarate, Félix Manuel, García Herbozo, Víctor Ramón, Giraldo Laguna, Orlando, Páez Requena, Cesar Felipe, Mendoza Solís, Jacinto Pedro
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2011
País:Perú
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/9597
Acceso en línea:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/matema/article/view/9597
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Voting intention
Municipal and Presidential Elections
Stratified Random Sampling
Size of sample.
Intención de voto
Elecciones Municipales y Presidenciales
Muestreo Aleatorio Estratificado
Tamaño de muestra.
Descripción
Sumario:In the present work, we present the results of the opinion poll of voting intentions of the students of San Marcos University in municipal elections of 2010 and presidential elections of 2011. We used stratified random sampling with allocation proportional to size (Scheffer y Mendenhall, 2007) and considered the following layers: Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, among others, in total twenty faculties of San Marcos University. The surveys were carried out in three stages, during the months of July, August and September. At each stage was considered to 500 participants who were selected from each of the twenty faculties, following the stratified sampling scheme with proportional allocation. o calculate the sample size was considered a limit to the estimation error of 4.41% with a confidence level of 95% and the information provided by the Unified Registration System (SUM) of students matriculated the first semester of 2010academic year. (Solano et al. 2011a).