Contractual and Entrepreneurial Freedom, and Its Tension with the Prohibition on Outsourcing Core Business Activities

The present article aims to argue that the prohibition on outsourcing services linked to the core of the business infringes upon the formal scope of the employer’s constitutional rights to freedom of contract and freedom of enterprise. This infringement arises from the failure to assess the nature o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Moscoso Becerra, Gerson
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:Perú
Institución:Poder Judicial del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/1269
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/1269
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:freedom
contract
enterprise
outsourcing
employer
libertad
contratación
empresa
tercerización
empleador
liberdade
contratação
terceirização
empregador
Descripción
Sumario:The present article aims to argue that the prohibition on outsourcing services linked to the core of the business infringes upon the formal scope of the employer’s constitutional rights to freedom of contract and freedom of enterprise. This infringement arises from the failure to assess the nature of outsourcing as a mechanism of business collaboration and from disregarding the binary nature of managerial authority. Such violations materialize through state intervention generated by the enactment of Supreme Decree No. 001-2022-TR. For this reason, managerial authority will be analyzed as a constitutional right of a binary nature, capable of optimization in outsourcing contexts, in order to demonstrate that the prohibition on outsourcing services collides with the content of contractual and entrepreneurial freedom. Finally, the action of amparo against an implementing regulation is proposed as the appropriate mechanism to protect the employer’s constitutional rights infringed by the regulation.