COMPARISON BETWEEN TESTICULAR PALPATION AND INDIRECT ELISA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF OVINE BRUCELLOSIS

The diagnosis of ovine brucellosis in Chile is based on clinical examination of the testicles and confirmed with a serological test, being the complement fixation test, agar gel immunodiffusion test and the indirect ELISA the most used. The present study was carried out in the Municipality of San Ig...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Troncoso T., Ignacio, González A., Judith, Navarrete A., Felipe, Lagos M., Alejandro, Fischer Wiethuchter, Christof
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2014
País:Perú
Recursos:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/10819
Acesso em linha:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/10819
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:brucellosis
ELISA
testicular palpation
kappa
brucelosis
palpación testicular
Descrição
Resumo:The diagnosis of ovine brucellosis in Chile is based on clinical examination of the testicles and confirmed with a serological test, being the complement fixation test, agar gel immunodiffusion test and the indirect ELISA the most used. The present study was carried out in the Municipality of San Ignacio, VIII Chilean region in 40 rams with the aim of comparing two diagnostic tools: testicular palpation and indirect ELISA for the antibody detection against Brucella ovis. The results showed 12 (30%) rams positive to testicular palpation and 5 rams (12.5%) positive to ELISA, where the level of agreement between the two diagnostic tests was poor (k=0.0714). Positive rams to brucellosis based on testicular palpation are not necessarily infected with B. ovis.