One, two, three... fourteen! Or sixty-six Trust and notion of the final consumer: a case of electronic commerce in consumer protection
This article is based on an electronic commerce case in consumer protection. We are not unprotected by the absence of a special regulation, but we must build the foundations for this trade to develop properly. Who put a complaint can be considered final consumer? because it does not acquire one, two...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20369 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/20369 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Electronic commerce Consumer Habituality Contract Price Error Comercio electrónico Consumidor Habitualidad Contrato Precio |
| Sumario: | This article is based on an electronic commerce case in consumer protection. We are not unprotected by the absence of a special regulation, but we must build the foundations for this trade to develop properly. Who put a complaint can be considered final consumer? because it does not acquire one, two, three or fourteen, (a reference to Vertigo of U2) but sixty-six products to S /. 1 that regularly cost more than S /. 1 000. Is the last agreement improved? and can the supplier of the operation carried out be withdrawn when considering the price of their offered products derisory? I incide in the need to generate confidence in the consumer, and that this is possible if the provider gives security, simple but gravitating. |
|---|