El principio de (des)confianza en la doctrina jurisprudencial de la Corte Suprema, a propósito del R.N. N° 1416-2018/Lima

The purpose of this article is to critically examine the scope of the (dis)trust principle as a criterion for objective imputation within business organizational contexts. Within this framework, a normative review of this concept will be conducted from a functionalist perspective, emphasizing its di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Armendariz Ochoa, Luis, Mejía Villanueva, Oscar
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:Perú
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:PUCP-Institucional
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/205058
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/32047/28004
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/205058
https://doi.org/10.18800/dys.202501.017
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Principle of trust
Objective imputation
Guarantor position
Economic crimes
Division of labor
Duty of vigilance
Principle of distrust
Principio de confianza
Imputación objetiva
Posición de garante
Delitos económicos
División de trabajo
Deber de vigilancia
Principio de desconfianza
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00
Descripción
Sumario:The purpose of this article is to critically examine the scope of the (dis)trust principle as a criterion for objective imputation within business organizational contexts. Within this framework, a normative review of this concept will be conducted from a functionalist perspective, emphasizing its differentiation and complementarity with the principle of trust, traditionally applied in criminal law. This paper will also address the arguments put forward by the Supreme Court in its ruling on Annulment Appeal No. 1416-2018, from the perspective of the proposed functionalist approach.