Paul Ricoeur y la noción de conatus de Spinoza

Even though Paul Ricoeur did not write an entire work about Spinoza, many interpreters have pointed out the relevance of the thought of the Dutch philosopher—and specially of his Ethics—to Ricoeur’s oeuvre. This paper seeks to show the significance of Spinoza’s notion of conatus in the hermeneutical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Olaechea Catter, Jorge
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:Perú
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:PUCP-Institucional
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/200669
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/29302/26580
https://doi.org/10.18800/arete.202401.003
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Ricoeur
Spinoza
Conatus
Ontology
Person
Ontología
Persona
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#6.03.01
Descripción
Sumario:Even though Paul Ricoeur did not write an entire work about Spinoza, many interpreters have pointed out the relevance of the thought of the Dutch philosopher—and specially of his Ethics—to Ricoeur’s oeuvre. This paper seeks to show the significance of Spinoza’s notion of conatus in the hermeneutical and ontological approach of the French philosopher. Specifically, it analyses an important conceptual node in the last Study of Oneself as Another. The analysis mainly considers those passages of Spinoza’s works that are quoted. It tries to expand the understanding of them considering the context in which they appear, in order to see if this allows to confirm the abovementioned relevance of Spinoza in Ricoeur’s philosophy.