Experts reports in engineering and construction arbitrations. Difficulties that arbitrators and experts must deal with. Some proposals from practical experience
During the development of an expert report, difficulties arise that may have a significant impact on its probatory value. This can be noted in the selection of the expert; in determining the scope of the report; in the form of access to the documentation of the process; in communications that the ex...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23250 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/23250 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Construction arbitrations Expert report Selection of the expert Scope of expert’s report Expert’s hearing Arbitrajes de construcción Dictamen pericial Selección del perito Alcance del peritaje Audiencia de peritaje |
| Sumario: | During the development of an expert report, difficulties arise that may have a significant impact on its probatory value. This can be noted in the selection of the expert; in determining the scope of the report; in the form of access to the documentation of the process; in communications that the expert may or may not have with the parties, their respective experts, and with the arbitrator; in the selection of methodologies to evaluate costs and extensions of time; in legal matters related to the technical aspects of the report; in the expert hearing; and in the content of the report itself. In this article we will seek to identify the difficulties that usually arise, with some proposals of possible solutions. |
|---|