Legitimacy of States of Emergency, in Light of Human Rights Instruments
This work deals with the limitations that the Government is legally authorized to make in relation to the validity of human and constitutional rights within states of emergency and, specifically, deals with cases of war, internal threats and the principle of strict necessity. In each of them, the au...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 1984 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6220 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/6220 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | human rights states of emergency limitations UN IACHR derechos humanos estados de excepción limitaciones ONU CIDH |
| Sumario: | This work deals with the limitations that the Government is legally authorized to make in relation to the validity of human and constitutional rights within states of emergency and, specifically, deals with cases of war, internal threats and the principle of strict necessity. In each of them, the author discusses in detail the casuistry and the possible terms of definition, developing extensive explanations on the European jurisprudence, of the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations Organization and of the Inter-American Commission. Special mention is made of the Lawless case, the case of Greece and the case of Ireland versus the United Kingdom of the European organizations; and the Ad Hoc Working Group on Chile of the United Nations system. |
|---|