Future of the TPP agreement facing of the US withdrew
The purpose of this article is to analyze the background of the negotiation and signing of an ambitious Multilateral Trade Agreement – TPP, whose purpose was to establish a commercial zone between Southeast Asian countries and countries of the Americas, which together represent approximately 40% of...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19360 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/19360 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement Free Trade Agreements Asia Pacific United States North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Trade Negotiations Peru P4 Acuerdo de Asociación Transpacífico acuerdos comerciales Asía Pacífico EE.UU. Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) negociaciones comerciales Perú |
| Sumario: | The purpose of this article is to analyze the background of the negotiation and signing of an ambitious Multilateral Trade Agreement – TPP, whose purpose was to establish a commercial zone between Southeast Asian countries and countries of the Americas, which together represent approximately 40% of the world economy with a population of around 800 million people. This effort, which began with the negotiation of P4, was later expanded with the inclusion of the United States of America and other countries that joined the process. Among the issues covered by this Agreement, there are some that cause rejection by some sectors, due to the implications for their economy. However, because of the position declared by the current President of the United States, Donald Trump, this process to reach a comprehensive and ambitious Agreement has stopped, and after that, several members have also expressed their intention to withdraw the process too. In the following months we will see the effects of those decisions. |
|---|