Habilidad lógica y mecanismos motivacionales en la evaluación de argumentos
The main objective of this research is to analyze the myside bias in two argument evaluation tasks: one linked to the paradigm of formal reasoning and the other linked to the paradigm of informal reasoning. For this, we develop and apply a reasoning test that combines formal reasoning tasks with inf...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/196601 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/27888/25878 https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/196601 https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202401.020 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Cognitive biases Motivated reasoning Argumentation Logic and reasoning Myside bias Biais cognitifs Raisonnement motivé Logique et raisonnement Biais de confirmation Preconceitos cognitivos Raciocínio motivado Argumentação Lógica e raciocínio Preconceito a meu favor Sesgos cognitivos Razonamiento motivado Argumentación Lógica y razonamiento Sesgo a mi favor https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.01.00 |
| Sumario: | The main objective of this research is to analyze the myside bias in two argument evaluation tasks: one linked to the paradigm of formal reasoning and the other linked to the paradigm of informal reasoning. For this, we develop and apply a reasoning test that combines formal reasoning tasks with informal reasoning tasks. The test was administered virtually to a total of 138 participants. The results confirmed the two hypotheses of the study, namely, that motivational mechanisms prevail over logical ability in the tasks of evaluating arguments (both deductive and non-deductive) and that the myside bias is significantly accentuated in the task of informal reasoning. |
|---|