La muerte de la buena fe registral
The article 2014 of the Civil Code has been recently modified. In order to make this decision, the legislator took in consideration two reasons: theaffirmation that the record entry doesn’t countswith its own substantivity, and that the necessityof adopting measures to fight against fraudulentac...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/109942 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14478/15090 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Derecho https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01 |
| Sumario: | The article 2014 of the Civil Code has been recently modified. In order to make this decision, the legislator took in consideration two reasons: theaffirmation that the record entry doesn’t countswith its own substantivity, and that the necessityof adopting measures to fight against fraudulentacts that might affect the owners.Following this modification, the author presents a comparative analysis of the before and after of the option the legislator took, and takes position after putting himself in the side of third parties. From a juridical and economical point of view, he studies the modification and concludes that, apart from not resolving the problems it had to solve, generates damages that affect the third parties and the market. |
|---|