Psychometric properties of the Emotional Intelligence scale TMMS-24 in adults of Metropolitan Lima, 2020

The present study aimed to analyze the psychometric properties of the TMMS-24 Emotional Intelligence scale in an adult population of Metropolitan Lima 2020. The research was instrumental in design. 430 participants were surveyed, of which filters were made, obtaining 211 good data. The test used was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Pérez Zarate, José Fernando, Quispe Plaza, Jacqueline Iraida, Tuesta Chamorro, Yermin Yolanda
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:Perú
Institución:Universidad César Vallejo
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad César Vallejo
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:oai.revistas.ucv.edu.pe:article/219
Acceso en línea:http://revistas.ucv.edu.pe/index.php/psiquemag/article/view/219
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Propiedades psicométricas
TMMS-24
Análisis factorial confirmatorio
Psychometric properties
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Descripción
Sumario:The present study aimed to analyze the psychometric properties of the TMMS-24 Emotional Intelligence scale in an adult population of Metropolitan Lima 2020. The research was instrumental in design. 430 participants were surveyed, of which filters were made, obtaining 211 good data. The test used was the TMMS-24 scale by Mayer and Salovey (1995), adapted to the Spanish language by Fernández-Berrocal, Extremera and Ramos (2004). The scale has 24 items where item 5 presents a low index of homogeneity, commonality and discrimination. In the Confirmatory Factor Analysis, indicators were used to analyze the fit of the model, CFI = .838, TLI = 846, RMSEA = .070 and SRMR = .085. When analyzing the relationship with other variables, a positive correlation was found with the WHO-FIVE (> .30) and a discriminant correlation with the DASS-21 (<.20). On the other hand, in the reliability analysis I show a greater similarity between alpha (.87) and omega (.85) in the Regulation dimension. Finally, in the equity analysis it was evidenced that the scale is invariant (∆CFI <.01; ∆RMSEA <.01) between men and women.