La legitimación en el proceso civil peruano
The objective of this article is to define the legitimacy of the process, as well as to understand the different types of legitimation that have been defined in the doctrine and, consequently, adopted in the Peruvian civil process. Also, it seeks to analyze how the control of this budget should be i...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/132807 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/20288/20242 https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201801.003 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Legitimación https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00 |
| Sumario: | The objective of this article is to define the legitimacy of the process, as well as to understand the different types of legitimation that have been defined in the doctrine and, consequently, adopted in the Peruvian civil process. Also, it seeks to analyze how the control of this budget should be in the process. It does not intend to settle a controversy, but only to expose our ideas, and try to give this procedural budget a practical purpose, from a reading of it from the Constitution and the general theory of the process. |
|---|