Separación de poderes y jueces constitucionales: un enfoque de roles correctores
An approach of corrective roles of judges within the constitutional interpretation demands a number of parameters that must necessarily be made compatible with the principles, values and guidelines pursuant to contemporary legal systems. This study covers the dimensions of these corrective roles in...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/116750 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14428/15042 https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201502.008 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Jueces constitucionales Roles correctores Separación de poderes Interpretación constitucional Estado jurisdiccional Neoconstitucionalismo https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00 |
| Sumario: | An approach of corrective roles of judges within the constitutional interpretation demands a number of parameters that must necessarily be made compatible with the principles, values and guidelines pursuant to contemporary legal systems. This study covers the dimensions of these corrective roles in the attempt to set reference lines on the delicate task of the constitutional judges in the defense of the effective exercise of the fundamental rights and the regulations’ primacy of the Constitution. Finally, this study investigates if there is a jurisdictional government and to what extent the neoconstitutionalism turns out to be a relevant matter in the interpretation of the Constitution. |
|---|