International Commercial Arbitration and Precautionary Protection: The Collaboration Between Judges and Arbitrators in the Adoption and Recognition of International Precautionary Measures
When referring to international commercial arbitration in Peru, two questions that have received little doctrinary reflection arise. These are, on one hand, the possibility that a Peruvian court may adopt a precautionary measure in assistance of a commercial arbitration based abroad and, on the othe...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23482 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/23482 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | International commercial arbitration effective international judicial protection international precautionary measure recognition of precautionary measures judicial intervention aid Arbitraje comercial internacional tutela jurisdiccional internacional efectiva medida cautelar internacional reconocimiento de medidas cautelares intervención judicial de apoyo |
| Sumario: | When referring to international commercial arbitration in Peru, two questions that have received little doctrinary reflection arise. These are, on one hand, the possibility that a Peruvian court may adopt a precautionary measure in assistance of a commercial arbitration based abroad and, on the other hand, the possibility of recognition by the Peruvian courts of a precautionary measure issued in the context of a commercial arbitration based abroad. They constitute the two sides of the same legal problem to which the author aims to reply by proposing a solution through a solid argumentative development. In this article, the author’s analysis departs from the importance of the right to effective international judicial protection, emphasizing on international precautionary protection. Moreover, he reflects on the duty of cooperation of the state courts in order to safeguard the effectiveness of precautionary protection in international commercial arbitration. At last, the author proposes certain criteria or parameters that would come in useful for the Peruvian state courts in order to adopt and recognize precautionary measures in support of international commercial arbitration when based abroad. |
|---|