Political praxis and morality in Machiavelli’s Prince
The main problem of this research raises the fact that the prince’s scholars argue, to a greater or lesser extent, that the thesis Machiavelli recommended the immorality as a general principle in political praxis. Our objective is to determine if Machiavelli recommended the immorality as a general p...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Country: | Perú |
| Institution: | Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón |
| Repository: | Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón |
| Language: | Spanish |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/3182 |
| Online Access: | https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/3182 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | naturaleza humana praxis pol´ıtica poder inmoralidad human nature political praxis power immorality |
| Summary: | The main problem of this research raises the fact that the prince’s scholars argue, to a greater or lesser extent, that the thesis Machiavelli recommended the immorality as a general principle in political praxis. Our objective is to determine if Machiavelli recommended the immorality as a general principle in political praxis. Our hypothesis is that Machiavelli didn’t recommend the immorality as a general principle in political praxis. That is, the father of political science recommended that in political praxis morality should be the rule and immorality should be the exception. |
|---|