¿Cuál es el bien jurídico protegido por el Art. 202.4 del Código Penal? Implicancias desde el D.Leg. 30076 y su práctica jurídico penal

The legal asset protected in the 202.4 Article of the Penal Code has a particularity in its theoretical-practical application, and that is the wording of the criminal offense has led to the understanding that the criminal action must fall on real estate in possession; however, when the terminology r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Romero Romero, Jorge Luis
Tipo de recurso: tesis de maestría
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:Perú
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:PUCP-Tesis
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:tesis.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.12404/29798
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/29798
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Derecho penal--Legislación--Perú
Derecho procesal penal--Jurisprudencia--Perú
Derechos reales--Legislación--Perú
Usurpación (Derecho)--Perú
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.02
Descripción
Sumario:The legal asset protected in the 202.4 Article of the Penal Code has a particularity in its theoretical-practical application, and that is the wording of the criminal offense has led to the understanding that the criminal action must fall on real estate in possession; however, when the terminology refers: “those who have to oppose” is modified and included in the criminal offense, the hermeneutical and interpretative possibility arises that the passive subject is not only the immediate or mediate possessor of the property, but also the one who, in accordance with the legal framework, can support a right of a real estate or real nature; specifically, the owner. Along these lines, in this investigation the general theoretical foundations related to the legal good are presented, to extend the quality of passive subject of the usurpation crime to those subjects who, without having the status of possessor, have a right of a nature, real guarantee that they will resort to criminal proceedings to save their interests. Likewise, it should be noted that this research has a dogmatic nature, which aspires to contribute to the construction of a social rule of law state which constitutional rights are adequately recognized, leaving aside restrictive interpretations of the regulation that prevent effective prosecution of crime.