Efectos de estilos de crianza sobre la depresión en adolescentes escolarizados de una muestra peruana

The objective of this research was to determine the influence exerted by parenting styles on the depression of Peruvian schooled adolescents. For this, a sample of 308 high school students was used, between men (47.1 %) and women (52.9 %), who had an average age of 14.5 years (SD = 2.218). It has a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Castro Renteria, Eliana V., Palacios Bustamante, Maria del Pilar E., Calderón Pauta, Ivonne D. M., González Diaz, Elina, Rayme Velasquez, Oskar A.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:Perú
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/23811
Acceso en línea:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/psico/article/view/23811
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Parenting styles
depression
teens
Estilos de crianza
depresión
adolescentes
Descripción
Sumario:The objective of this research was to determine the influence exerted by parenting styles on the depression of Peruvian schooled adolescents. For this, a sample of 308 high school students was used, between men (47.1 %) and women (52.9 %), who had an average age of 14.5 years (SD = 2.218). It has a non-experimental, empirical design of associative strategy, classified within an explanatory study. To measure the chosen study variables, the following were used: the Family Parenting Styles Scale (ECF-29) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); both with solid evidence of validity and reliability. The results of the structural equation model analysis revealed that 42 % (r2=.42) explains the variance of depression and 65 % (r2=.65) explains the variance of parenting styles. In addition, the best predictor of depression is the overprotective style (β=.43), followed by the authoritarian (β=.18) and indulgent (β=.17) style; unlike the democratic style, which does not explain depression in adolescents in a relevant way (β= - .09). It is concluded that depression is being explained with greater intensity by the common characteristics of the overprotective parenting style, while the democratic parenting style does not do so significantly.