[Effect of invitation to colonoscopy screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death (the NordICC study): Critical reading:]
Presentation: The NordICC study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects, with a 10-year follow-up, of inviting individuals aged 55 to 64 years to undergo a single colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer (CC) compared to those who were not invited and did not undergo screening. Study findings: Th...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo |
| Repositorio: | Revista del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:cmhnaaa_ojs_cmhnaaa.cmhnaaa.org.pe:article/2107 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://cmhnaaa.org.pe/ojs/index.php/rcmhnaaa/article/view/2107 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Colonoscopía Neoplasias Colorrectales Tamizaje Masivo Colonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasms Mass Screening |
| Sumario: | Presentation: The NordICC study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects, with a 10-year follow-up, of inviting individuals aged 55 to 64 years to undergo a single colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer (CC) compared to those who were not invited and did not undergo screening. Study findings: The group that received the colonoscopy screening invitation had lower risk of CC in comparison to the group that did not undergo screening. Critical commentary: The study's eligibility criteria closely resembled real-life scenarios. However, the inclusion of participants with CC risk factors and the potential differential effects in this subgroup remain unclear. The invitation for a single colonoscopy screening did not result in clinically important benefits in terms of CC risk, CC mortality, and all-cause mortality. On the other hand, complications associated with the screening procedure were infrequent or negligible. It is important to note a high risk of bias in the blinding-related domains. |
|---|