The civil judge's evidence initiative: An evil debate raised
To determine if the judge must or not have probatory initiative, meaning to have appointed proofs by the judge, radical positions must be left aside, this is limitless probatory initiative, or the absolute omission of the appointed proofs by the judge. The point is to look for a balance point where...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2008 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/130 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/130 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | probatory initiative appointed proofs by the judge procedural guarantees iniciativa probatoria pruebas de oficio garantías procesales |
| Sumario: | To determine if the judge must or not have probatory initiative, meaning to have appointed proofs by the judge, radical positions must be left aside, this is limitless probatory initiative, or the absolute omission of the appointed proofs by the judge. The point is to look for a balance point where the attribution of the judge of appointed proofs requirement is limited assuring impartiality and protecting the right of defense of the litigants, searching for the respect of the procedural guarantees and also the effectiveness of the process. |
|---|