The ratification of judges in Peru: Is it compatible with judicial independence?
The judges ratification regime, every seven years since the beginning of the judicial career in Peru, has become a complex reality. Added to this is the configuration of a new modality of partial evaluation of judges, every three and a half years. We seek to unravel that these figures are incompatib...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/188 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/188 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | judicial independence ratification of judges partial evaluation of judges inter-American human rights system proportionality test independencia judicial ratificación de jueces evaluación parcial de jueces Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos test de proporcionalidad |
| Sumario: | The judges ratification regime, every seven years since the beginning of the judicial career in Peru, has become a complex reality. Added to this is the configuration of a new modality of partial evaluation of judges, every three and a half years. We seek to unravel that these figures are incompatible with the principle of judicial independence, the same as that in Comparative Law is expressed in a statute of indefinite appointment to the position of judge. |
|---|