Accounting and tax aspects of earnings under the scope of the peruvian tax legislation

Objectives: Describe technically the accounting and tax aspects of the accrual under the scope of the Peruvian tax legislation and identify a trend in the interpretation of the matter in the tax field for its application therein. Method: The research was quantitative, cross-sectional, non-experiment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Oscanoa Ponce, Bill Frank, Levano Huamaccto, Ronald Studer
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:Perú
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/20194
Acceso en línea:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/quipu/article/view/20194
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Accrual
Tax Court
Taxpayers
Income Tax
IFRS 15
Devengo
Tribunal Fiscal
contribuyentes
Impuesto a la Renta
NIIF 15
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives: Describe technically the accounting and tax aspects of the accrual under the scope of the Peruvian tax legislation and identify a trend in the interpretation of the matter in the tax field for its application therein. Method: The research was quantitative, cross-sectional, non-experimental and descriptive in scope. The sample was made up of the various conclusions of the Tax Court from 1997 to 2017. Results: The results of the investigation show that 68% of the resolutions issued by the Tax Court consider an accounting concept compared to 32% that take a legal concept to resolve the controversy facing the accrual. Conclusion: In conclusion, there is a significant trend in the use of the accounting concept by the Tax Court from 1997 to 2017 for its application in the Income Tax Law, given that seven out of ten cases were solved under an accrual accounting concept; because of this, it is necessary to incorporate an accrual concept in the Income Tax Law, whose validity is as of fiscal year 2019 in order to mitigate said controversy that was given in the previous years.