International Arbitration under debate
Is the choice of the arbitral seat still an important decision in international arbitration? Should arbitral awards be subject to greater judicial scrutiny? Should the appeal be in international arbitration? Is it possible that an annulled arbitral award is recognized under the New York Convention? ...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19094 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/19094 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | International Arbitration Commercial Arbitration Investment Arbitration New York Convention Arbitral Seat Arbitral Award Arbitraje Internacional Arbitraje Comercial Arbitraje de Inversiones Convención de Nueva York Sede Arbitral Laudo |
| Sumario: | Is the choice of the arbitral seat still an important decision in international arbitration? Should arbitral awards be subject to greater judicial scrutiny? Should the appeal be in international arbitration? Is it possible that an annulled arbitral award is recognized under the New York Convention? Should the New York Convention be amended to achieve CNY 2.0? Is investment arbitration a system that works? Are the criticisms of investment arbitration valid? In this interview, Gary Born responds to each of these questions by addressing many controversial current issues in international arbitration. |
|---|