Six theses to demystify the nexus between migration and development

The reigning assumption in migration and development studies is that international migration promotes development in places and countries of origin. But this idea lacks a theoretical and empirical basis: it ignores the root causes underlying the exodus of millions of poor workers forced to struggle...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Delgado Wise, Raúl, Rodríguez Ramírez, Héctor, Márquez Covarrubias, Humberto
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2009
País:México
Recursos:Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas
Repositório:Repositorio Institucional Caxcán
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:http://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx:20.500.11845/52
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11845/52
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:CIENCIAS SOCIALES [5]
info:eu-repo/classification/Desarrollo desigual
info:eu-repo/classification/Migración forzada
info:eu-repo/classification/Reestructuración capitalista
info:eu-repo/classification/Transferencia de excedentes
info:eu-repo/classification/Remesas
info:eu-repo/classification/Unequal development
info:eu-repo/classification/Forced migration
info:eu-repo/classification/Capitalist restructuring
info:eu-repo/classification/Surplus transference
info:eu-repo/classification/Remittances
Descrição
Resumo:The reigning assumption in migration and development studies is that international migration promotes development in places and countries of origin. But this idea lacks a theoretical and empirical basis: it ignores the root causes underlying the exodus of millions of poor workers forced to struggle for their survival in the developed nations; it discards the contributions made by migrants to the economy of the receiving countries, and obfuscates the many transferences and costs migration represents for sending countries–loses that are not compensated by remittance flow. This article proposes the construction of a comprehensive approach to the phenomenon through six theses that analyze key aspects of the global capitalist restructuring process in practice during the past three decades. The Mexico-United States case is used as a paradigmatic example of the socioeconomic losses incurred by workforce-exporting nations and the enormous benefits reaped by labor-importing countries.