CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND IN SITU EVALUATION OF FRESH AND ENSILED SUGARCANE (Saccharum officinarum)
This study evaluated chemical composition and in situ degradability of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and ruminal pH of fresh (FSC) and ensiled (SCS) sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) forage diets. In situ digestibility was determined using the nylon bag technique with four cows fitted with a...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | Universidad de Guadalajara |
| Repositorio: | Redalyc-UDG |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:redalyc.org:93944043003 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93944043003 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Agrociencias rumen forage in situ digestibility Sugarcane silage |
| id |
MX_e15cbeed617681fd2efa2194f1e11e21 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:redalyc.org:93944043003 |
| network_acronym_str |
MX |
| network_name_str |
México |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND IN SITU EVALUATION OF FRESH AND ENSILED SUGARCANE (Saccharum officinarum)José Andrés Reyes-GutiérrezCándido Enrique Guerra-MedinaOziel Dante Montañez-ValdezAgrocienciasrumenforagein situdigestibilitySugarcane silageThis study evaluated chemical composition and in situ degradability of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and ruminal pH of fresh (FSC) and ensiled (SCS) sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) forage diets. In situ digestibility was determined using the nylon bag technique with four cows fitted with a rumen cannula. Cows were fed with fresh or ensiled sugar cane and supplemented with 1 kg of commercial dairy concentrate (18% CP). Ground sample (5g) for each sugar cane (FSC, and SCS) were incubated in rumen for 0, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h. Treatments were distributed in a completely randomized design with six replicates. ESC showed significant changes (P<0.05) in DM, ADF, NDF and ash. In situ digestibility of dry matter (ISDDM, %) was higher (P<0.05) for FCS in most incubation periods with respect to SCS, except at 24 h of incubation in which no difference (P>0.05) was noted. In situ digestibility of organic matter (ISDOM, %) was higher (P<0.05) for FCS at incubation periods of 8, 36, 48 and 96 h; however at 24 h of incubation was higher (P<0.05) in SCS. The ISDOM was similar (P>0.05) at 12 and 76 h of incubation. The ruminal pH showed no differences (P>0.05) between treatments. It is concluded that the silage of sugar cane is an alternative to provide forage in the season of low growth and quality of the grass.Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán2015info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdf1870-0462https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93944043003Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems (México) Num.3 Vol.18reponame:Redalyc-UDGinstname:Universidad de Guadalajarainstacron:UDGenhttp://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=939Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystemsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:redalyc.org:939440430032026-01-29T04:45:09Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND IN SITU EVALUATION OF FRESH AND ENSILED SUGARCANE (Saccharum officinarum) |
| title |
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND IN SITU EVALUATION OF FRESH AND ENSILED SUGARCANE (Saccharum officinarum) |
| spellingShingle |
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND IN SITU EVALUATION OF FRESH AND ENSILED SUGARCANE (Saccharum officinarum) José Andrés Reyes-Gutiérrez Agrociencias rumen forage in situ digestibility Sugarcane silage |
| title_short |
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND IN SITU EVALUATION OF FRESH AND ENSILED SUGARCANE (Saccharum officinarum) |
| title_full |
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND IN SITU EVALUATION OF FRESH AND ENSILED SUGARCANE (Saccharum officinarum) |
| title_fullStr |
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND IN SITU EVALUATION OF FRESH AND ENSILED SUGARCANE (Saccharum officinarum) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND IN SITU EVALUATION OF FRESH AND ENSILED SUGARCANE (Saccharum officinarum) |
| title_sort |
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND IN SITU EVALUATION OF FRESH AND ENSILED SUGARCANE (Saccharum officinarum) |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
José Andrés Reyes-Gutiérrez Cándido Enrique Guerra-Medina Oziel Dante Montañez-Valdez |
| author |
José Andrés Reyes-Gutiérrez |
| author_facet |
José Andrés Reyes-Gutiérrez Cándido Enrique Guerra-Medina Oziel Dante Montañez-Valdez |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Cándido Enrique Guerra-Medina Oziel Dante Montañez-Valdez |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Agrociencias rumen forage in situ digestibility Sugarcane silage |
| topic |
Agrociencias rumen forage in situ digestibility Sugarcane silage |
| description |
This study evaluated chemical composition and in situ degradability of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and ruminal pH of fresh (FSC) and ensiled (SCS) sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) forage diets. In situ digestibility was determined using the nylon bag technique with four cows fitted with a rumen cannula. Cows were fed with fresh or ensiled sugar cane and supplemented with 1 kg of commercial dairy concentrate (18% CP). Ground sample (5g) for each sugar cane (FSC, and SCS) were incubated in rumen for 0, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h. Treatments were distributed in a completely randomized design with six replicates. ESC showed significant changes (P<0.05) in DM, ADF, NDF and ash. In situ digestibility of dry matter (ISDDM, %) was higher (P<0.05) for FCS in most incubation periods with respect to SCS, except at 24 h of incubation in which no difference (P>0.05) was noted. In situ digestibility of organic matter (ISDOM, %) was higher (P<0.05) for FCS at incubation periods of 8, 36, 48 and 96 h; however at 24 h of incubation was higher (P<0.05) in SCS. The ISDOM was similar (P>0.05) at 12 and 76 h of incubation. The ruminal pH showed no differences (P>0.05) between treatments. It is concluded that the silage of sugar cane is an alternative to provide forage in the season of low growth and quality of the grass. |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
1870-0462 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93944043003 |
| identifier_str_mv |
1870-0462 |
| url |
https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93944043003 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
en |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
en |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=939 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems (México) Num.3 Vol.18 reponame:Redalyc-UDG instname:Universidad de Guadalajara instacron:UDG |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Guadalajara |
| instacron_str |
UDG |
| institution |
UDG |
| reponame_str |
Redalyc-UDG |
| collection |
Redalyc-UDG |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1858177364701216768 |
| score |
15,812429 |