La posesión alienable y la inalienable: ¿oposición o continuidad? El ejemplo del purhépecha
There are différents ways to express possession. In this paper; I principally emphasize the value of the information which is included in the possessor's mark. As a consequence; I present two paradigms which permit to express possession: the possessive pronouns (“alienable”) and the possessive...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ela.enallt.unam.mx:article/301 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ela.enallt.unam.mx/index.php/ela/article/view/301 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | linguistics; Possessive Pronousm Possessive sulffixes; Semantic; Syntactical; Lingüística descriptiva; Lenguas indíguenas; Pronombres posesivos en Phurhepecha; Sintaxis; Semántica |
| Sumario: | There are différents ways to express possession. In this paper; I principally emphasize the value of the information which is included in the possessor's mark. As a consequence; I present two paradigms which permit to express possession: the possessive pronouns (“alienable”) and the possessive suffixes (“inalienable”). The inalienable relation can be described as natural; essential and permanent. It includes the notion of integration of the possessed object. In return; the alienable relation can be defined as acquired; optional and temporal. According to the syntactical level; the way the units of these classes works is different; especially the type of relation they have with the other terms of the language. On the semantic level; these units can express the existence of an association between two entities; in which one participates in the personal sphere of the other. We can analize these two types of relation admitting two extreme poles: on the one hand; the maximum integration of the object; and; on the other hand; the no-integration. Between these opposed poles; exists a graduation in the use of the marks of the possession which permits the existence of a continuity. |
|---|