Participation of partisan leaders in radio and television spots: permissiveness versus restriction, in light of jurisprudential criteria
Between 2016 and 2017, the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Court of the Federal Judicial Branch ordered the National Electoral Institute, via judgments, to draw up guidelines that would serve to identify behaviors that could constitute violations of the regulations on political and electoral commu...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Institucional de Acceso Abierto RIAA-BUAP |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorioinstitucional.buap.mx:20.500.12371/4394 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.apps.buap.mx/ojs3/index.php/dike/article/view/751 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12371/4394 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | electoral equity, leaders of political parties, spots on radio and television, “couple court” guidelines equidad electoral, dirigentes de partidos políticos, spots en radio y televisión, lineamientos de “cancha pareja” |
| Sumario: | Between 2016 and 2017, the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Court of the Federal Judicial Branch ordered the National Electoral Institute, via judgments, to draw up guidelines that would serve to identify behaviors that could constitute violations of the regulations on political and electoral communication. These guidelines once elaborated, were considered by the Superior Court itself to be excessive. The cases derived from these resolutions are discussed in this article. Their relevance is that they sought to regulate the guidelines. These were considered the standard to a dialogue between the electoral administrative authority and the jurisdictional authority. Additionally, the discussion of these practical cases provided a pattern that opened a debate around the validity of a concept that has been established as the main pillar of the Mexican Electoral System: Which raises the question; is there equity in the political contest? At least on how it has been conceived until now. |
|---|