Albert and others v. Hungary: The Strasbourg Court facing the Limitation of Corporate Participation Rights
The European Court of Human Rights may resolve claims filed by natural persons, groups of individuals or non-governmental organizations accusing the violation of human rights protected in the European Convention and its protocols. In Albert et al v. Hungary, the complainants argued that the state di...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Cuestiones Constitucionales. Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18592 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/cuestiones-constitucionales/article/view/18592 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Standing European Court of Human Rights human rights corporate participation rights subsidiarity margin of appreciation regional consensus corporate vail legitimación Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos derechos humanos derechos de participación corporativa subsidiariedad margen de apreciación consenso regional velo corporativo |
| Sumario: | The European Court of Human Rights may resolve claims filed by natural persons, groups of individuals or non-governmental organizations accusing the violation of human rights protected in the European Convention and its protocols. In Albert et al v. Hungary, the complainants argued that the state disturbed their right to property by applying stringent regulations to the banks in which they participated as shareholders. This case is about the degree of legitimacy that a person has to sue before the Strasbourg Court the affectation of their right to property, specifically when the national authorities act over a company. In addition, the judgement leads to reflect on the arguments to respond a substantive study, such as proportionality test, the national margin of appreciation and the regional consensus in the regulation of a right. |
|---|