Qualitatively Varied Reinforcement: A Replication of Steinman (1968)

Steinman (1968a) conducted the first experiment using a free-operant procedure to compare the effects of qualitatively varied reinforcers versus constant reinforcers in rats’ lever pressing. Steinman found that varied reinforcers maintained higher relative response rates. Steinman’s finding is incon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Roca, Alicia, Gutiérrez, Brissa, Benavides, Rodrigo
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:México
Institución:UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO
Repositorio:Acta Comportamentalia
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/84994
Acceso en línea:https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/acom/article/view/84994
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:qualitatively varied reinforcement
replication
Steinman (1968)
multiple schedule of reinforcement
rats
reforzamiento cualitativamente variado
replicación
programa múltiple de reforzamiento
ratas
Descripción
Sumario:Steinman (1968a) conducted the first experiment using a free-operant procedure to compare the effects of qualitatively varied reinforcers versus constant reinforcers in rats’ lever pressing. Steinman found that varied reinforcers maintained higher relative response rates. Steinman’s finding is inconsistent with recent studies showing that constant reinforcers produce higher rates of responding than those produced by varied reinforcers. To assess the replicability of Steinman’s finding, an experiment was conducted using the same general methods as described by the author. Four rats were exposed to a three-component multiple schedule. In each component, lever presses were maintained by a chained variable-interval 45 s, fixed- ratio 1 schedule. Either sucrose solution or pellets were delivered in two constant reinforcer components and sucrose solution and pellets were delivered alternately in the varied reinforcer component. There were no systematic differences in response rates across the three components of the multiple schedule. Steinman’s finding cannot be replicated under conditions other than the circumscribed set of variables present in his experiment, thus it lacks generality. The implications of replication failures in behavior analysis and the use of qualitatively varied reinforcers in applied settings are discussed. New directions for future research are suggested.