Molecular systematics of the Dichopetala genus group (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae)

Introduction: The Dichopetala genus group was proposed recently after revision of the genus Dichopetala Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878. Currently, the group consists of eight genera and 44 species distributed from Southern United States to Southern Mexico. This generic arrangement was based solely on m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Aurora Y. Rocha-Sánchez, Alejandro Zaldívar-Riverón, Vladimir Salvador De Jesús-Bonilla, Ludivina Barrientos-Lozano, Alfonso Correa-Sandoval
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:México
Institución:Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Repositorio:Redalyc-UNAM
OAI Identifier:oai:redalyc.org:44965908023
Acceso en línea:https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44965908023
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/449/44965908023/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/449/44965908023/html/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/449/44965908023/44965908023.epub
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/449/44965908023/movil
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Biología
monophyly
morphology
molecular analyses
Dichopetaline genera
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: The Dichopetala genus group was proposed recently after revision of the genus Dichopetala Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878. Currently, the group consists of eight genera and 44 species distributed from Southern United States to Southern Mexico. This generic arrangement was based solely on morphological evidence, and was accompanied by discussions on new erected genera, for which their monophyly was not tested. Objective: To assess the phylogenetic relationships among representative species of the eight genera of the Dichopetala group. Methods: We generated DNA sequences for one mitochondrial (Cytochrome oxidase I: COI) and two nuclear (28S, Histone III: H3) gene markers, and included species of other Phaneropterinae genera to test the monophyly of the ingroup; Bayesian and maximum likelihood evolutionary models were used. Results: The monophyly of the Dichopetala group and the monophyly of genera Dichopetala, Obolopteryx, Planipollex, Mactruchus and Rhabdocerca is supported. In addition, Acanthorintes and Pterodichopetala were recovered as paraphyletic. The mitochondrial markers also suggest that the widely distributed genera Rhabdocerca and Acanthorintes may actually contain various overlooked species. Conclusions: The first contribution on the Phylogeny of the Dichopetala group, and a more robust phylogenetic and morphological definition of some of the genera involved are provided.