Teoría de la épica en el Renacimiento y el Barroco hispanos y la épica indiana
The epic theory of the 16th and 17th centuries was dominated by thePoetics of Aristotle and by the model of Virgil. In spite of that, we will argue that the Spanish epic poems that deal with the Conquista setthemselves apart. The main requirements of the epic theory were temporaldistance and the per...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | EL COLEGIO DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Nueva revista de Filología Hispánica |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:oai.nrfh.colmex.mx:article/1170 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://nrfh.colmex.mx/index.php/nrfh/article/view/1170 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Spanish epic poems 16th and 17th centuries epic theory epic and conquista epic and history romanzo and novel épica hispana siglos XVI y XVII teoría de la épica épica y conquista épica e historia romanzo y novela |
| Sumario: | The epic theory of the 16th and 17th centuries was dominated by thePoetics of Aristotle and by the model of Virgil. In spite of that, we will argue that the Spanish epic poems that deal with the Conquista setthemselves apart. The main requirements of the epic theory were temporaldistance and the perfect hero; the Spanish poems, on the contrary,related recent facts and deeds, and their (real) heroes were farfrom being perfect. The Spanish authors found a solution in two directions:1) equating epic and history, 2) adopting the Italian model of theromanzo (Boiardo, Ariosto). Thus, two modern models, quite differentfrom those inherited from Antiquity, appeared. However, at the end ofthe 16th century, doubts arose about the authenticity of the new models;this became quite evident in the poetics of Pincianos, who suspectedthat the novel might be superior to the epic poem. Parting fromthis intuition, the article ends with a reflexion −inspired by the theoryof the novel of Lukácz− on the antinomy of epic and novel as theauthentic expression of modernity. |
|---|