Technical comparison of FACTS controllers in parallel connection
The Static VA R Compensator (SVC) and Static Synchronous Compensator (STATCOM) have the ability to provide dynamic compensation to a transmission system. Their speed of response enable increased transient stability margins, voltage support enhancement, and damping of low frequency oscillations. The...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
| Repositorio: | Redalyc-UNAM |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:redalyc.org:47450521005 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=47450521005 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/474/47450521005/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/474/47450521005/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/474/47450521005/47450521005.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/474/47450521005/movil |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Ingeniería SVC FACTS STATCOM Reactive power Transmission system Power electronic |
| Sumario: | The Static VA R Compensator (SVC) and Static Synchronous Compensator (STATCOM) have the ability to provide dynamic compensation to a transmission system. Their speed of response enable increased transient stability margins, voltage support enhancement, and damping of low frequency oscillations. The main operational objective of both FACTS devices is to increase power transmission capability by voltage control at the point of connection of the power network. In this research both controllers are compared by their most important features, such as the following: the performance VI and VQ curves, the response time, the physical size, the cost and behavior in steady-state and transient stability. Results show a small advantage of the STATCOM. |
|---|