Multispectral-derived genotypic similarities from budget cameras allow grain yield prediction and genomic selection augmentation in single and multi-environment scenarios in spring wheat
With abundant available genomic data, genomic selection has become routine in many plant breeding programs. Multispectral data captured by UAVs showed potential for grain yield (GY) prediction in many plant species using machine learning; however, the possibilities of utilizing this data to augment...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Institucional de Publicaciones Multimedia del CIMMYT |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repository.cimmyt.org:10883/23038 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10883/23038 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Multispectral Imaging Grain Yield Genomic Prediction GRAIN YIELDS HIGH-THROUGHPUT PHENOTYPING SPRING WHEAT Genetic Resources |
| Sumario: | With abundant available genomic data, genomic selection has become routine in many plant breeding programs. Multispectral data captured by UAVs showed potential for grain yield (GY) prediction in many plant species using machine learning; however, the possibilities of utilizing this data to augment genomic prediction models still need to be explored. We collected high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) multispectral data in a genotyped multi-environment large-scale field trial using two cost-effective cameras to fill this gap. We tested back to back the prediction ability of GY prediction models, including genomic (G matrix), multispectral-derived (M matrix), and environmental (E matrix) relationships using best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) methodology in single and multi-environment scenarios. We discovered that M allows for GY prediction comparable to the G matrix and that models using both G and M matrices show superior accuracies and errors compared with G or M alone, both in single and multi-environment scenarios. We showed that the M matrix is not entirely environment-specific, and the genotypic relationships become more robust with more data capture sessions over the season. We discovered that the optimal time for data capture occurs during grain filling and that camera bands with the highest heritability are important for GY prediction using the M matrix. We showcased that GY prediction can be performed using only an RGB camera, and even a single data capture session can yield valuable data for GY prediction. This study contributes to a better understanding of multispectral data and its relationships. It provides a flexible framework for improving GS protocols without significant investments or software customization. |
|---|