Comparison of beverage consumption in adult populations from three different countries: do the international reference values allow establishing the adequacy of water and beverage intakes?

Introduction: Recommendations of adequate total water intake (aTWI) have been proposed by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the United States of America. However, there are differences in the approach used to support them: IOM recommendation is based on av...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Mariela Nissensohn, Daniel Fuentes Lugo, Lluis Serra-Majem
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2016
País:México
Institución:Universidad Autónoma del Carmen
Repositorio:Redalyc-UNACAR
OAI Identifier:oai:redalyc.org:309246896006
Acceso en línea:https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=309246896006
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Medicina
ANIBES
Adults
Beverages
Energy intake
Adequate total water intake
id MX_b4597d0f7942ece376c9669c0982e978
oai_identifier_str oai:redalyc.org:309246896006
network_acronym_str MX
network_name_str México
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of beverage consumption in adult populations from three different countries: do the international reference values allow establishing the adequacy of water and beverage intakes?Mariela NissensohnDaniel Fuentes LugoLluis Serra-MajemMedicinaANIBESAdultsBeveragesEnergy intakeAdequate total water intakeIntroduction: Recommendations of adequate total water intake (aTWI) have been proposed by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the United States of America. However, there are differences in the approach used to support them: IOM recommendation is based on average intakes observed in NHANES III (Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) and EFSA recommendation on a combination of observed intakes from 13 different European countries. Despite these recommendations of aTWI, the currently available scientifi c evidence is not suffi cient to establish a cut-off value that would prevent disease, reduce the risk for chronic diseases or improve health status. Objective: To compare the average daily consumption of fl uids (water and other beverages) in selective samples of population from Mexico, US and Spain, evaluating the quantity of fl uid intake and understanding the contribution of each fl uid type to the total fl uid intake. We also aim to determine if they reached adequate intake (AI) values, as defi ned by three different criteria: IOM, EFSA and water density. Methods: Three studies were compared: from Mexico, the National Health and Nutrition Survey conducted in 2012 (NHNS 2012); from US, the NHANES III 2005- 2010 and from Spain the ANIBES study leaded in 2013. Different categories of beverages were used to establish the pattern of energy intake for each country. Only adult population was selected. TWI of each study was compared with EFSA and IOM AI recommendations, as well as applying the criterion of water density (mL/kcal). Results: The American study obtained the higher value of total kcal/day from food and beverages (2,437 ± 13). Furthermore, the percentage of daily energy intake coming from beverages was, for American adults, 21%. Mexico was slightly behind with 19% and Spain ANIBES study registered only 12%. ANIBES showed signifi cantly low AI values for the overall population, but even more alarming in the case of males. Only 12% of men, in contrast with 21% of women, do satisfy the EFSA criterion. The IOM criterion reaches even less with higher recommended values for daily intake. In contrast, 60% of the American population reached the recommended intake of the IOM criterion. However, available data did not allow calculating the percentage reached by the EFSA criterion. Data from the Mexican study did not permit conducting comparisons with IOM or with EFSA. However, the water density criteria (mL/kcal) was higher than 1. Conclusion: There is a notable difference between all three populations in terms of TWI. Furthermore, within the same population, values of adequacy of TWI changed signifi cantly when they were assessed using different criteria. More scientifi c evidence is required for the production of better defi ned water intake recommendations in the future as well as more studies focusing on beverage consumption patterns in different settings.Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral2016info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdf0212-1611https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=309246896006Nutrición Hospitalaria (España) Num.3 Vol.33reponame:Redalyc-UNACARinstname:Universidad Autónoma del Carmeninstacron:UNACARenhttp://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3092Nutrición Hospitalariainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:redalyc.org:3092468960062024-08-23T21:47:53Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of beverage consumption in adult populations from three different countries: do the international reference values allow establishing the adequacy of water and beverage intakes?
title Comparison of beverage consumption in adult populations from three different countries: do the international reference values allow establishing the adequacy of water and beverage intakes?
spellingShingle Comparison of beverage consumption in adult populations from three different countries: do the international reference values allow establishing the adequacy of water and beverage intakes?
Mariela Nissensohn
Medicina
ANIBES
Adults
Beverages
Energy intake
Adequate total water intake
title_short Comparison of beverage consumption in adult populations from three different countries: do the international reference values allow establishing the adequacy of water and beverage intakes?
title_full Comparison of beverage consumption in adult populations from three different countries: do the international reference values allow establishing the adequacy of water and beverage intakes?
title_fullStr Comparison of beverage consumption in adult populations from three different countries: do the international reference values allow establishing the adequacy of water and beverage intakes?
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of beverage consumption in adult populations from three different countries: do the international reference values allow establishing the adequacy of water and beverage intakes?
title_sort Comparison of beverage consumption in adult populations from three different countries: do the international reference values allow establishing the adequacy of water and beverage intakes?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mariela Nissensohn
Daniel Fuentes Lugo
Lluis Serra-Majem
author Mariela Nissensohn
author_facet Mariela Nissensohn
Daniel Fuentes Lugo
Lluis Serra-Majem
author_role author
author2 Daniel Fuentes Lugo
Lluis Serra-Majem
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Medicina
ANIBES
Adults
Beverages
Energy intake
Adequate total water intake
topic Medicina
ANIBES
Adults
Beverages
Energy intake
Adequate total water intake
description Introduction: Recommendations of adequate total water intake (aTWI) have been proposed by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the United States of America. However, there are differences in the approach used to support them: IOM recommendation is based on average intakes observed in NHANES III (Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) and EFSA recommendation on a combination of observed intakes from 13 different European countries. Despite these recommendations of aTWI, the currently available scientifi c evidence is not suffi cient to establish a cut-off value that would prevent disease, reduce the risk for chronic diseases or improve health status. Objective: To compare the average daily consumption of fl uids (water and other beverages) in selective samples of population from Mexico, US and Spain, evaluating the quantity of fl uid intake and understanding the contribution of each fl uid type to the total fl uid intake. We also aim to determine if they reached adequate intake (AI) values, as defi ned by three different criteria: IOM, EFSA and water density. Methods: Three studies were compared: from Mexico, the National Health and Nutrition Survey conducted in 2012 (NHNS 2012); from US, the NHANES III 2005- 2010 and from Spain the ANIBES study leaded in 2013. Different categories of beverages were used to establish the pattern of energy intake for each country. Only adult population was selected. TWI of each study was compared with EFSA and IOM AI recommendations, as well as applying the criterion of water density (mL/kcal). Results: The American study obtained the higher value of total kcal/day from food and beverages (2,437 ± 13). Furthermore, the percentage of daily energy intake coming from beverages was, for American adults, 21%. Mexico was slightly behind with 19% and Spain ANIBES study registered only 12%. ANIBES showed signifi cantly low AI values for the overall population, but even more alarming in the case of males. Only 12% of men, in contrast with 21% of women, do satisfy the EFSA criterion. The IOM criterion reaches even less with higher recommended values for daily intake. In contrast, 60% of the American population reached the recommended intake of the IOM criterion. However, available data did not allow calculating the percentage reached by the EFSA criterion. Data from the Mexican study did not permit conducting comparisons with IOM or with EFSA. However, the water density criteria (mL/kcal) was higher than 1. Conclusion: There is a notable difference between all three populations in terms of TWI. Furthermore, within the same population, values of adequacy of TWI changed signifi cantly when they were assessed using different criteria. More scientifi c evidence is required for the production of better defi ned water intake recommendations in the future as well as more studies focusing on beverage consumption patterns in different settings.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 0212-1611
https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=309246896006
identifier_str_mv 0212-1611
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=309246896006
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
language_invalid_str_mv en
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3092
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Nutrición Hospitalaria
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Nutrición Hospitalaria
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Nutrición Hospitalaria (España) Num.3 Vol.33
reponame:Redalyc-UNACAR
instname:Universidad Autónoma del Carmen
instacron:UNACAR
instname_str Universidad Autónoma del Carmen
instacron_str UNACAR
institution UNACAR
reponame_str Redalyc-UNACAR
collection Redalyc-UNACAR
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1858176633810190336
score 15,812455

Similares en LA Referencia