Student perceptions of learning management at the Faculty of Accounting and Administration at UACH
OBJECTIVE: To analyze students’ perceptions from the Faculty of Accounting and Administration at Universidad Autónoma de Chihuaha [UACH] regarding the management of learning delivery. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A descriptive and cross-sectional research study was conducted in 2024, based on a mixed approa...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE TABASCO |
| Repositorio: | Hitos de Ciencias Económico Administrativas |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistahitos.ujat.mx:article/6347 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistahitos.ujat.mx/hitos/article/view/6347 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | percepción administración docencia infraestructura satisfacción estudiantil. perception management teaching infrastructure student satisfaction. |
| Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To analyze students’ perceptions from the Faculty of Accounting and Administration at Universidad Autónoma de Chihuaha [UACH] regarding the management of learning delivery. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A descriptive and cross-sectional research study was conducted in 2024, based on a mixed approach with a hypothetical-deductive method. To collect data, a survey was administered to 148 students, designed to investigate demographic aspects, as well as perceptions regarding educational administration, teaching staff, infrastructure, and resources. The sample was calculated with a confidence level of 86% and a margin of error of 6%. RESULTS: 54.1% of students rated the educational administration as “good”, while 64.9% considered the administrative staff accessible. Regarding the teaching staff, 48.6% rated them as “good”,, and 54.7% perceived them as “available” outside the lesson hours. The infrastructure was rated as “good” by 45.9%, and the technological facilities as “adequate” by 43.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Student perception reflects general satisfaction with educational administration, although areas for improvement remain, especially in administrative accessibility and technological resources. |
|---|