Comparative Analysis of Two Bioclimatic Classification Systems Applied in Mexico

The characteristics of the different types of climate result from the functioning of the climate system and reflect the influence of the various components that collectively affect it. The study of climate behavior, distribution and evolution analyzes various meteorological elements (temperature, pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Hernández Cerda, María Engracia, Ordoñez Díaz, María de Jesús, Giménez de Azcárate, Joaquín
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:México
Institución:UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO
Repositorio:Investigaciones Geográficas
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/57451
Acceso en línea:https://www.investigacionesgeograficas.unam.mx/index.php/rig/article/view/57451
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:México
clima
bioclima
clasificaciones
García
Rivas-Martínez
Mexico
climate
bioclimate
classifications
Garcia
Rivas-MartInez
id MX_9da0bfbb0bbfb2b40aa2b0c21de157fe
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/57451
network_acronym_str MX
network_name_str México
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative Analysis of Two Bioclimatic Classification Systems Applied in Mexico
Análisis comparativo de dos sistemas de clasificación bioclimática aplicados en México
title Comparative Analysis of Two Bioclimatic Classification Systems Applied in Mexico
spellingShingle Comparative Analysis of Two Bioclimatic Classification Systems Applied in Mexico
Hernández Cerda, María Engracia
México
clima
bioclima
clasificaciones
García
Rivas-Martínez
Mexico
climate
bioclimate
classifications
Garcia
Rivas-MartInez
title_short Comparative Analysis of Two Bioclimatic Classification Systems Applied in Mexico
title_full Comparative Analysis of Two Bioclimatic Classification Systems Applied in Mexico
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Two Bioclimatic Classification Systems Applied in Mexico
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Two Bioclimatic Classification Systems Applied in Mexico
title_sort Comparative Analysis of Two Bioclimatic Classification Systems Applied in Mexico
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Hernández Cerda, María Engracia
Ordoñez Díaz, María de Jesús
Giménez de Azcárate, Joaquín
author Hernández Cerda, María Engracia
author_facet Hernández Cerda, María Engracia
Ordoñez Díaz, María de Jesús
Giménez de Azcárate, Joaquín
author_role author
author2 Ordoñez Díaz, María de Jesús
Giménez de Azcárate, Joaquín
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv México
clima
bioclima
clasificaciones
García
Rivas-Martínez
Mexico
climate
bioclimate
classifications
Garcia
Rivas-MartInez
topic México
clima
bioclima
clasificaciones
García
Rivas-Martínez
Mexico
climate
bioclimate
classifications
Garcia
Rivas-MartInez
description The characteristics of the different types of climate result from the functioning of the climate system and reflect the influence of the various components that collectively affect it. The study of climate behavior, distribution and evolution analyzes various meteorological elements (temperature, precipitation, wind, atmospheric pressure, humidity, etc.), at different spatial and temporal ranges that can be considered either individually or in combination.Bioclimatic studies are structured from the establishment of relationships between climatology and the distribution of plants. This paper reviews and applies two climate classification proposals related to the vegetation to Mexico: a) the Modified System (SM), based on Köppen’s climate classification, selected because it is widely known, easily applied, based on the implicit premise that natural vegetation is an indicator of climate, and for considering that some of its categories are supported on the climatic boundaries of certain plant formations. It was modified to adapt it to the orographic conditions of Mexico, which largely account for the great biodiversity.These modifications include, among others, the application of Lang’s index (total annual precipitation/mean annual temperature), percent winter rainfall, thermal zoning, and the use of a plant species locally called gobernadora (Larrea tridentata) as a reference for the distribution of arid regions in northern Mexico and southwestern United States. This system has been used in several issues of official map collections of Mexico.The other climate classification system is the Worldwide Bioclimatic Classification System (WBCS), which establishes the relationships of reciprocity between the potential vegetation and the bioclimatic thresholds associated with the proposed indices, which characterize the system’s typological units (macrobioclimate, bioclimate and thermotype). The different categories recognized at each level allow setting the type of system defined by the geographical distribution, thermal and ombric figures on an annual, seasonal or monthly basis, and that show specific discriminating threshold values.We analyzed daily data recorded in 1303 weather stations of Mexico with over 30 years of information between 1955-2008, obtained from the National Meteorological Service (SMN). After application of different homogeneity tests, these data were classified according to the two systems. In the SM, the diagnosis was obtained using the Modifica Program; in the case of the WBCS, the classification was made using a worksheet.The equivalence between the two systems was explored by comparing the climatic types obtained from the SM, grouped by rainfall regime with macrobioclimates, organized by the degree of moisture with bioclimates and ombrotypes, and sorted by thermal areas with the thermotypes of WBCS. The results obtained are shown in tabular format. The comparison of the hierarchical units of highest rank in both systems evidences that the climates with summer and intermediate rainfall regime match the Tropical macrobioclimate, while those with winter rainfall regime correspond to the Mediterranean macrobioclimate.The overall agreement found between SM and Bioclimates was 98%, reaching 100% in some cases, particularly regarding the pluvial and pluvialseasonal bioclimates; the agreement for dry climate types was 70%.The equivalence between ombrotypes and subtypes grouped according to the humidity conditions of the SM was 100% for the categories of lower humidity and above 75% for humid categories.The two systems share many similarities in the humidity conditions; nonetheless, the equivalencies between the thermotypes of the WBCS and the thermal zones of the SM are approximations, as the former includes several thermal zones of the SM.The equivalences found were used to label the different polygons on the map of climates published by CONABIO, at scale one to one million, and the maps of Macrobioclimates and Bioclimates were drawn. These were compared with maps previously published by several authors, noting that the ones obtained in this work agree with them in general terms; the differences found are attributed to the methodologies used in the definition of the bioclimatic and macroclimatic cartographies, as well as to the scale of maps.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.investigacionesgeograficas.unam.mx/index.php/rig/article/view/57451
10.14350/rig.57451
url https://www.investigacionesgeograficas.unam.mx/index.php/rig/article/view/57451
identifier_str_mv 10.14350/rig.57451
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.investigacionesgeograficas.unam.mx/index.php/rig/article/view/57451/53082
https://www.investigacionesgeograficas.unam.mx/index.php/rig/article/view/57451/53188
https://www.investigacionesgeograficas.unam.mx/index.php/rig/article/view/57451/53213
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2017 Investigaciones Geográficas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2017 Investigaciones Geográficas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Geografía
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Geografía
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Investigaciones Geográficas; No. 95
Investigaciones Geográficas; Núm. 95
2448-7279
0188-4611
reponame:Investigaciones Geográficas
instname:UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO
instacron:UNAM
instname_str UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO
instacron_str UNAM
institution UNAM
reponame_str Investigaciones Geográficas
collection Investigaciones Geográficas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1858176306246582272
spelling Comparative Analysis of Two Bioclimatic Classification Systems Applied in MexicoAnálisis comparativo de dos sistemas de clasificación bioclimática aplicados en MéxicoHernández Cerda, María EngraciaOrdoñez Díaz, María de JesúsGiménez de Azcárate, JoaquínMéxicoclimabioclimaclasificacionesGarcíaRivas-MartínezMexicoclimatebioclimateclassificationsGarciaRivas-MartInezThe characteristics of the different types of climate result from the functioning of the climate system and reflect the influence of the various components that collectively affect it. The study of climate behavior, distribution and evolution analyzes various meteorological elements (temperature, precipitation, wind, atmospheric pressure, humidity, etc.), at different spatial and temporal ranges that can be considered either individually or in combination.Bioclimatic studies are structured from the establishment of relationships between climatology and the distribution of plants. This paper reviews and applies two climate classification proposals related to the vegetation to Mexico: a) the Modified System (SM), based on Köppen’s climate classification, selected because it is widely known, easily applied, based on the implicit premise that natural vegetation is an indicator of climate, and for considering that some of its categories are supported on the climatic boundaries of certain plant formations. It was modified to adapt it to the orographic conditions of Mexico, which largely account for the great biodiversity.These modifications include, among others, the application of Lang’s index (total annual precipitation/mean annual temperature), percent winter rainfall, thermal zoning, and the use of a plant species locally called gobernadora (Larrea tridentata) as a reference for the distribution of arid regions in northern Mexico and southwestern United States. This system has been used in several issues of official map collections of Mexico.The other climate classification system is the Worldwide Bioclimatic Classification System (WBCS), which establishes the relationships of reciprocity between the potential vegetation and the bioclimatic thresholds associated with the proposed indices, which characterize the system’s typological units (macrobioclimate, bioclimate and thermotype). The different categories recognized at each level allow setting the type of system defined by the geographical distribution, thermal and ombric figures on an annual, seasonal or monthly basis, and that show specific discriminating threshold values.We analyzed daily data recorded in 1303 weather stations of Mexico with over 30 years of information between 1955-2008, obtained from the National Meteorological Service (SMN). After application of different homogeneity tests, these data were classified according to the two systems. In the SM, the diagnosis was obtained using the Modifica Program; in the case of the WBCS, the classification was made using a worksheet.The equivalence between the two systems was explored by comparing the climatic types obtained from the SM, grouped by rainfall regime with macrobioclimates, organized by the degree of moisture with bioclimates and ombrotypes, and sorted by thermal areas with the thermotypes of WBCS. The results obtained are shown in tabular format. The comparison of the hierarchical units of highest rank in both systems evidences that the climates with summer and intermediate rainfall regime match the Tropical macrobioclimate, while those with winter rainfall regime correspond to the Mediterranean macrobioclimate.The overall agreement found between SM and Bioclimates was 98%, reaching 100% in some cases, particularly regarding the pluvial and pluvialseasonal bioclimates; the agreement for dry climate types was 70%.The equivalence between ombrotypes and subtypes grouped according to the humidity conditions of the SM was 100% for the categories of lower humidity and above 75% for humid categories.The two systems share many similarities in the humidity conditions; nonetheless, the equivalencies between the thermotypes of the WBCS and the thermal zones of the SM are approximations, as the former includes several thermal zones of the SM.The equivalences found were used to label the different polygons on the map of climates published by CONABIO, at scale one to one million, and the maps of Macrobioclimates and Bioclimates were drawn. These were compared with maps previously published by several authors, noting that the ones obtained in this work agree with them in general terms; the differences found are attributed to the methodologies used in the definition of the bioclimatic and macroclimatic cartographies, as well as to the scale of maps.Se comparan dos sistemas de clasificación climática, el de Köppen modificado por García (SM) usado en México, Centro y Suramérica, y el Bioclimático Global de Rivas-Martínez (WBCS), con aplicación mundial. Ambos utilizan elementos como la precipitación y la temperatura, para establecer distintas combinaciones y definir sus tipologías climáticas. El WBCS emplea, los promedios de precipitación, de temperaturas máximas y mínimas a partir de los que define los principales índices bioclimáticos. El SM emplea los promedios anuales y mensuales de precipitación y temperatura media para definir los diferentes grados de humedad y de temperatura.Se analizaron los datos de 1303 estaciones climatológicas con más de 30 años de información, previa aplicación de diferentes pruebas de homogeneidad. Los datos se clasificaron con los dos sistemas, y se compararon los Macrobioclimas y Bioclimas del WBCS con los subgrupos del SM. Con base en el mapa de climas de Köppen Modificado por García, escala uno a un millón, se elaboraron los mapas de Macrobioclimas y Bioclimas.Los dos sistemas tienen muchas semejanzas en las condiciones de humedad; no se encontraron equivalencias tan precisas entre los termotipos del WBCS y las zonas térmicas del SM, por la diferencia en los elementos climatológicos empleados en ambos.Instituto de Geografía2018-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/epub+ziphttps://www.investigacionesgeograficas.unam.mx/index.php/rig/article/view/5745110.14350/rig.57451Investigaciones Geográficas; No. 95Investigaciones Geográficas; Núm. 952448-72790188-4611reponame:Investigaciones Geográficasinstname:UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICOinstacron:UNAMspahttps://www.investigacionesgeograficas.unam.mx/index.php/rig/article/view/57451/53082https://www.investigacionesgeograficas.unam.mx/index.php/rig/article/view/57451/53188https://www.investigacionesgeograficas.unam.mx/index.php/rig/article/view/57451/53213Derechos de autor 2017 Investigaciones Geográficasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/574512024-11-05T15:51:10Z
score 15.812429