Protection of Personal Data on Electoral ID, Examining Public Information. Right to Privacy vs. Guiding Principles of the Electoral Function
The objective of this text is to analyze the SUP-RAP-37/201-3 precedent, as well as having an influence on the promotion of the right to informative self-determination on the electoral ID. This right has its origins in the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Judicial Court resolution which rejected th...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Estudios en Derecho a la Información |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14662 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derecho-informacion/article/view/14662 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Informative self-determination electoral ID weighing progressivity maximization Autodeterminación informativa credencial para votar ponderación progresividad maximización |
| Sumario: | The objective of this text is to analyze the SUP-RAP-37/201-3 precedent, as well as having an influence on the promotion of the right to informative self-determination on the electoral ID. This right has its origins in the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Judicial Court resolution which rejected the agreement CG/732/2012 presented by the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE). Such decision forced the administrative electoral authority to per-form the weighing method through a balancing test between the “right to privacy of the individual versus the guiding principles of the electoral function”. The text is divided into four stages: contextualization of the concrete case, analysis of quantitative data, social exercise, and conclusion. |
|---|