Analysis of the construct validity and reliability of an instrument used to evaluate sustainability training in higher education
Purpose: To analyze construct validity and reliability of the instrument, “Evaluation for Training in Sustainability in Higher Education” composed of 27 items and four dimensions (Knowledge appropriation, University relationship, University education and Socioeconomic impact). Methodology: Through t...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Entreciencias: diálogos en la sociedad del conocimiento |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/70323 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/entreciencias/article/view/70323 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Factorial analysis assessment instrument construct validity. análisis factorial instrumento de evaluación validez de constructo. |
| Sumario: | Purpose: To analyze construct validity and reliability of the instrument, “Evaluation for Training in Sustainability in Higher Education” composed of 27 items and four dimensions (Knowledge appropriation, University relationship, University education and Socioeconomic impact). Methodology: Through the application of the instrument to 498 undergraduate students, an exploratory factor analysis was carried out to analyze the validity of the construct. Reliability was estimated using Cronbach's Alpha. Results: The representation of all the items within the factorial model was found; however, differences were observed with respect to the theoretical proposal since the items were represented in six dimensions (University education, University relationship, Linkage and socioeconomic impact, Appropriation of knowledge, Application and social impact of sustainability and Evaluation of university sustainability) that explained more than 68 % of the variance. Overall reliability was optimal (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.903) as well as for each factor. Limitations: The elements that make up the instrument restrict its application exclusively to higher education institutions. Findings: A valid and reliable instrument is presented in which the elements that integrate it are related and represent the proposed construct. |
|---|