Keynes, the current one
This article emphasizes the study of the convergent relationship between Keynesian, post-Keynesian and heterodox elaborations, all taken into consideration with respect to other heterodox versions. The actuality of Keynes operates in the logic of the epigraph taken from Skidelsky, in his Essencial K...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Country: | México |
| Institution: | UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA |
| Repository: | Denarius |
| Language: | Spanish |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:denarius.izt.uam.mx:article/493 |
| Online Access: | https://denarius.izt.uam.mx/index.php/denarius/article/view/493 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Orthodoxy heterodoxy Keynesianism post-Keynesianism Ortodoxia heterodoxia keynesianismo post keynesianismo |
| Summary: | This article emphasizes the study of the convergent relationship between Keynesian, post-Keynesian and heterodox elaborations, all taken into consideration with respect to other heterodox versions. The actuality of Keynes operates in the logic of the epigraph taken from Skidelsky, in his Essencial Keynes, of 2015: “Keynes’s ideas will live as long as the world requires of them”; globalization and its setbacks, the terrifying pandemic, still ongoing, and slowly, uncertain and erratic recovery, are the elements that once again invoke and summon Keynes and the theoretical and methodological apparatus with which he built his monetary economy of production. Thus, it returns to us not because of the nostalgia of his followers, fundamentalists and not so much, but because of the recurring complication that builds a capitalism left to the impossibility of self-regulation. |
|---|