Actuar o no actuar: un análisis comparativo del rol de los estados de Chiapas y Arizona en la gestión de la inmigración
Setting immigration policy is reserved for the federal government in both Mexico and the United States. However, de facto, the states in both countries carry out certain immigration policies. Chiapas and Arizona have both faced challenges in this area. The government of Arizona has followed an anti-...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
| Repositorio: | Memoria Institucional CISAN, Repositorio Institucional, UNAM |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ru.micisan.unam.mx:123456789/19845 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ru.micisan.unam.mx/handle/123456789/19845 http://dx.doi.org/10.20999/nam.2016.a006 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | CIENCIAS SOCIALES Political science International relations 5 international migration irregular migration undocumented immigration migratory policy multi-level immigration management migratory federalism migración internacional migración irregular inmigración indocumentada política migratoria gestión inmigratoria multinivel federalismo migratorio Ciencia política Relaciones internacionales |
| Sumario: | Setting immigration policy is reserved for the federal government in both Mexico and the United States. However, de facto, the states in both countries carry out certain immigration policies. Chiapas and Arizona have both faced challenges in this area. The government of Arizona has followed an anti-immigrant logic, while the government of Chiapas has focused on the defense of migrants’ human rights. The aim of this article is to understand the practically opposite roles played by these two states in managing immigration. |
|---|