The jurisprudential paths of consistent interpretation: scope and limits of its application by the Mexican Supreme Court
In light of the decisions developed by the Mexican Supreme Court during the last years, this paper aims to show the ways in which the principle of consistent interpretation has run along different lines of reasoning, sometimes without a particular direction and some others towards a functional orien...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Cuestiones Constitucionales. Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13941 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/cuestiones-constitucionales/article/view/13941 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Consistent interpretation constitutional interpretation human rights Mexican Supreme Court constitutional block conventionality control international treaties Interpretación conforme interpretación constitucional derechos humanos Suprema Corte bloque de constitucionalidad control de convencionalidad tratados internacionales parámetro de control de regularidad constitucional |
| Sumario: | In light of the decisions developed by the Mexican Supreme Court during the last years, this paper aims to show the ways in which the principle of consistent interpretation has run along different lines of reasoning, sometimes without a particular direction and some others towards a functional orientation. It also presents not only a chronological but also a political and legal evolution of this tool, and analyses the impact that some decisions have had in the Court’s legal thinking in order to achieve a more flexible and dynamic perspective about the constitutional interpretation of rights. |
|---|