Validity and reliability of the Mexican resilience measurement scale in families of children with chronic conditions

The resilience to face disease is a process of positive adaptation despite the loss of health. It involves developing vitality and skills to overcome the negative effects of adversity, risks, and vulnerability caused by disease. In Mexico, the Mexican Resilience Measurement Scale (RESI-M) has been v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Toledano-Toledano, Filiberto
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:México
Institución:Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
Repositorio:Repositorio Institucional Abierto de Conocimiento en Salud Pública
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.insp.mx:20.500.12096/7988
Acceso en línea:https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC5729504
https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0817-3
http://repositorio.insp.mx:8080/jspui/handle/20.500.12096/7988
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Outcome Assessment, Health Care,Quality of Life,Family caregivers, Instrumental study Mexican version Pediatric chronic disease Psychometric properties RESI-m Reliability Resilience Validity.
info:eu-repo/classification/cti/3
Descripción
Sumario:The resilience to face disease is a process of positive adaptation despite the loss of health. It involves developing vitality and skills to overcome the negative effects of adversity, risks, and vulnerability caused by disease. In Mexico, the Mexican Resilience Measurement Scale (RESI-M) has been validated with a general population and has a five-factor structure. However, this scale does not allow evaluation of resilience in specific subpopulations, such as caregivers. Method: This study investigated the psychometric properties of RESI-M in 446 family caregivers of children with chronic diseases. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed, internal consistency values were calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and mean comparisons were determined using t-tests. Results: The expected five-factor model showed an adequate fit with the data based on a maximum likelihood test. The internal consistency for each factor ranged from .76 to .93, and the global internal consistency was .95. No average difference in RESI-M and its factors was found between women and men. Conclusion: The RESI-M showed internal consistency and its model of five correlated factors was valid among family caregivers of children with chronic diseases.