Metabolic Control of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Comparison Between the Diabetimss program and Family Medicine offices

Objective: To determine the metabolic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus seen in the Diabetimss program and in family medicine offices. Methods: cross-sectional analytical study, 243 records were analyzed; the rate of metabolic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in fami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Wong Márquez, Luis F., García Torres, Osvaldo, Cruz Morales, Roberto A., Álvarez Villaseñor, Andrea S.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:México
Institución:UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO
Repositorio:Atención Familiar
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/81188
Acceso en línea:https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/atencion_familiar/article/view/81188
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2
Medicina Familiar
enfermedades no comunicables
Diabetes Mellitus
Type 2
Family Medicine
Noncommunicable Diseases
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To determine the metabolic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus seen in the Diabetimss program and in family medicine offices. Methods: cross-sectional analytical study, 243 records were analyzed; the rate of metabolic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in family medicine offices and in Diabetimss was assessed. Descriptive statistics were performed for demographic variables and Pearson’s χ2 to determine statistical differences between groups. Results: of the 243 files, 54.3% were from the Diabetimss group and 45.7% from the family practice, age was 54.11 ±10.86 vs 63.83 ± 12.03 years, fasting glucose of 128. 61 ±45.63 vs 150.27 ± 55.24 (p= 0.001, ic 0.000-0.000), triglycerides 154.20 ±90.96 vs 176.86 ±88.05 (p= 0.001, CI 1.377-3.865) and HbA1c 6.84 ± 1.52 vs 7.93 ±2.26 (p= 0.001 CI 0.526-1.656). Conclusion: there was no metabolic control in the studied population regardless of the consultation context. High values were detected in cholesterol, hdl, ldl and triglyceride levels, with statistically significant differences in both groups.