The Constitutionalization of the Appeal Proceedings in the Chilean Administrative Litigation
Recently, the Chilean Constitutional Court sanctioned the unconstitutionality of administrative contentious processes without appeal proceedings, under an abstract and general control. Retrospectively, this judgment represents a shift in case law, which had only affirmed a principle of appeal in adm...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Cuestiones Constitucionales. Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18805 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/cuestiones-constitucionales/article/view/18805 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | appeal procedure administrative litigation administrative acts constitutional review doble instancia contencioso administrativo actos administrativos control constitucional |
| Sumario: | Recently, the Chilean Constitutional Court sanctioned the unconstitutionality of administrative contentious processes without appeal proceedings, under an abstract and general control. Retrospectively, this judgment represents a shift in case law, which had only affirmed a principle of appeal in administrative contentious processes. Prospectively, this judgment is also a modification of an interpretative criterion capable of producing different effects relating to judicial review of administrative decisions. This article analyzes each aspect and investigates the basis of the declaration of unconstitutionality administrative contentious processes without appeal proceedings. Subsequently, different readings are proposed in relation to the constitutionality of administrative contentious processes without appeal proceedings. |
|---|